Self-Reflexivity: A Place for Religion and Spirituality in Public Administration
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 65, Heft 3, S. 324-334
ISSN: 1540-6210
14 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 65, Heft 3, S. 324-334
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 65, Heft 3, S. 324-334
ISSN: 0033-3352
In: Public Productivity & Management Review, Band 22, Heft 2, S. 232
In: Administration & society, Band 40, Heft 1, S. 3-24
ISSN: 1552-3039
In this article, the authors examine the importance of expressive and aesthetic truth claims to public administration scholars, and present a model to aid them in making and evaluating such claims. Sincere expression adds credibility to an argument, and quality of expression can lend elegance to a truth claim. Expressive or aesthetic truth claims are not merely used to heighten emotions or enhance sensory experience; more importantly, they can also contribute to the efficacy of an empirical or normative truth claim. Through the judicious use of these truth claims, significance and meaning can be attached to the bare facts of empirical inquiry or a recommendation to act.
In: Administration & society, Band 40, Heft 1, S. 3-24
ISSN: 0095-3997
In: Administration & society, Band 38, Heft 2, S. 147-165
ISSN: 1552-3039
This article presents a conceptual model related to normative truth claims and is advanced as part of a larger project involving the development of a logical taxonomy of options available to public administration scholars as they assess projects of various kinds. The model differentiates among five types of truth claims, two paradigmatic options, various theoretical perspectives, four forms of argumentation, and several kinds of evidence, creating a roadmap that can be used by scholars—particularly those just entering the field—to conceptualize and articulate their projects. It also provides a framework against which normative truth claims can be evaluated.
In: Administration & society, Band 38, Heft 2, S. 147-165
ISSN: 0095-3997
In: Administration & society, Band 36, Heft 3, S. 306-327
ISSN: 1552-3039
This article addresses the strategies and tools that public administration scholars use to understand phenomena of interest. The range of qualitative methods used has been limited, and the kind of rigor generally associated with quantitative methods has largely been absent in the application of their qualitative counterparts. Two conclusions are drawn from an analysis of articles published in two respected journals: Training on research methods in Ph.D. and M.P.A. programs should be expanded to include a broader range of strategies and tools, and the rigorous use of a broader range of research tools promises to better position the field of public administration to identify, examine, and answer the many big questions that it now faces.
In: Administration & society, Band 36, Heft 3, S. 306-327
ISSN: 0095-3997
In: Journal of community practice: organizing, planning, development, and change sponsored by the Association for Community Organization and Social Administration (ACOSA), Band 12, Heft 3-4, S. 71-88
ISSN: 1543-3706
In: Human Rights Quarterly, Band 15, Heft 1, S. 197
In: Human rights quarterly: a comparative and international journal of the social sciences, humanities, and law, Band 15, Heft 1, S. 197-204
ISSN: 0275-0392